Is the displayed income a lender approval requirement?
No. It is a planning estimate produced from the displayed ratios and adjustable mathematical assumptions. It does not represent a lender decision or approval guarantee.
Income planning scenario
Under the selected $400,000 price, $80,000 down payment, 6.5% annual rate, 30-year term, $500 monthly debt, $400 tax, and $150 insurance assumptions, the illustrative annual gross income is $110,255.
Every value below is generated by the shared loan and income-planning functions. All three columns use a selected 6.5% nominal annual rate and 30-year term. The property-tax input equals 1% of the displayed price per year and the insurance input equals 0.35% per year; these are transparent mathematical assumptions, not market averages or lender criteria.
| Home price | 20% down; no other debt | 10% down; no other debt | 20% down; $1,200 monthly debt |
|---|---|---|---|
| $200,000 | $52,985 | $58,402 | $81,210 |
| $300,000 | $79,477 | $87,604 | $101,815 |
| $400,000 | $105,969 | $116,805 | $122,421 |
| $500,000 | $132,462 | $146,006 | $143,026 |
| $600,000 | $158,954 | $175,207 | $163,631 |
| $700,000 | $185,446 | $204,408 | $185,446 |
It includes the calculated loan principal and interest plus the entered property tax and insurance. The selected 28% housing and 36% total-debt ratios are labeled planning assumptions.
Maintenance, association dues, closing costs, loan-specific insurance, utilities, tax effects, product fees, and underwriting decisions are excluded. The output is not a guarantee of approval.
No. It is a planning estimate produced from the displayed ratios and adjustable mathematical assumptions. It does not represent a lender decision or approval guarantee.
The calculator includes principal, interest, entered monthly property tax, and entered monthly property insurance. Other costs remain excluded unless represented in those inputs.
The selected total-debt planning ratio compares housing cost plus entered monthly debts with gross income. When that constraint becomes tighter than the housing-only ratio, more income is required in the model.